top of page

NCAA Juniors Basketball Midseason Analysis

5 minutes ago
4 min read

Based on Group A and Group B Standings and Statistical Rankings (as of November 6, 2026)

The NCAA Juniors Basketball tournament has developed into a compelling contrast between two highly competitive groups. While Group A is defined by defensive efficiency and balance, Group B is characterized by offensive firepower and high-scoring performances.


GROUP A

JRU • CSB-LSGH • MU • SBU • LPU

Group A features four of the league's top six defensive teams, making it arguably the toughest defensive bracket in the tournament. Teams in this group generally emphasize half-court execution, rebounding, and disciplined team defense.


Jose Rizal University (JRU)

JRU has established itself as the premier defensive team in the tournament, allowing only 68.38 points per game, the fewest among all schools. The team is led by Lorenz Cinco, who averages 17.92 points per game, while Johnlord Cruz anchors the paint with a tournament-leading 10.85 rebounds per game. JRU's combination of scoring efficiency and defensive consistency makes them a legitimate championship contender.

Key Strengths

  • No. 1 in scoring defense

  • Strong rebounding presence

  • Efficient guard play

  • Deep starting unit


CSB-LSGH

CSB-LSGH is arguably the most complete team in Group A. The squad ranks third in scoring offense at 85.25 points per game while also posting elite defensive numbers. The trio of Josef Calo-oy, Jaime Hizon, and Patrick Pasinos provides one of the strongest offensive cores in the league. The team leads all schools in three-point shooting and shot-blocking.

Key Strengths

  • Best perimeter offense in NCAA Juniors

  • League leader in blocked shots

  • Strong rebounding team

  • Balanced scoring attack


Mapúa University (MU)

MU's success revolves around dominant interior play from Chris Parame, who averages 13.33 points, 9.5 rebounds, and 2.42 blocks per game. MU ranks third in defensive scoring and fifth in offensive production, making them a dangerous dark horse capable of challenging any team in the playoffs.

Key Strengths

  • Interior scoring

  • Shot blocking

  • Rebounding

  • Defensive toughness


San Beda University (SBU)

San Beda has relied heavily on defense and physical play throughout the season. The Red Cubs rank second in points allowed at 70.17 points per game but rank ninth offensively. Their success has been built on limiting opponents' scoring opportunities and controlling the boards through Edlex Bonzalida.

Key Strengths

  • Elite team defense

  • Rebounding

  • Physical style of play


Lyceum of the Philippines University (LPU)

LPU has struggled statistically this season, averaging only 64.5 points per game, the lowest among all participating teams. However, the team remains competitive behind the efforts of Steven Creus, who averages 15.08 points per game. Improvement in offensive efficiency will be critical if the team hopes to move up the standings.

Key Area for Improvement

  • Scoring efficiency

  • Rebounding depth

  • Perimeter shooting


GROUP B

UPHSD • EAC • CSJL • AU • SSCR

Group B is the tournament's offensive powerhouse group. Four of the top five scoring teams belong to this bracket, making it the most explosive group offensively.


University of Perpetual Help System DALTA (UPHSD)

UPHSD has been the most dominant offensive team in the tournament, leading the league with 94.08 points per game. Their balanced attack is spearheaded by Don Rosales, Sizco Roquid, and Lord Dulanas. The team also leads in steals, assists, bench scoring, and turnover points.

Key Strengths

  • Best offense in NCAA Juniors

  • Deepest bench

  • Strong transition game

  • Multiple scoring options


Emilio Aguinaldo College (EAC)

EAC has quietly developed into one of the most balanced teams in the tournament. Ranked fourth in scoring offense and fifth in defense, EAC combines scoring efficiency with strong team rebounding. The team is led by Xyriel Macahipay and Tristan Allam.

Key Strengths

  • Balanced offense and defense

  • Good rebounding

  • Strong depth


Colegio de San Juan de Letran (CSJL)

CSJL is one of the most fundamentally sound teams in the tournament. They rank first in assists per game and are among the league leaders in defensive efficiency. Ethan Aguas has emerged as one of the NCAA's most complete players, averaging 19.09 points and 9.36 rebounds per game.

Key Strengths

  • Best ball movement

  • Efficient offense

  • Strong interior defense


Arellano University (AU)

AU is one of the most exciting teams in the league, leading the NCAA in fastbreak points and second-chance points. The team revolves around tournament scoring leader Laurence Pillas, who is averaging 21.18 points, 5.91 assists, and 3.91 steals per game. AU plays with tremendous pace and pressure but remains vulnerable defensively, ranking last in points allowed.

Key Strengths

  • Transition offense

  • Playmaking

  • Creating turnovers

Key Concern

  • Lowest-ranked scoring defense


San Sebastian College-Recoletos (SSCR)

SSCR is powered by the outstanding individual play of Khaizer Castillo, who averages 18.23 points, 4.23 assists, and 1.92 steals per game. However, team defense has been a challenge throughout the season, as SSCR allows 88.46 points per game, the second-highest in the league.

Key Strengths

  • High-scoring backcourt

  • Offensive rebounding

  • Aggressive style

Group Comparison

Category

Stronger Group

Scoring Offense

Group B

Team Defense

Group A

Rebounding

Slight Edge Group A

Star Players

Even

Depth

Group B

Inside Play

Group A

Pace of Play

Group B

Overall Assessment

Based on the current statistics, CSB-LSGH, JRU, and UPHSD appear to be the strongest championship contenders.

  • UPHSD possesses the most explosive offense.

  • JRU remains the best defensive team.

  • CSB-LSGH is the most balanced team statistically.

  • CSJL, AU, and EAC form a dangerous second tier capable of making deep playoff runs.

  • MU could become the tournament's sleeper team because of its defense and interior dominance.

If the season ended today, a projected Final Four based strictly on statistical performance would be:

  1. UPHSD

  2. CSB-LSGH

  3. JRU

  4. CSJL

with AU, EAC, and MU all having realistic opportunities to challenge for those spots.

 

 
 
 

Comments


footer

© 2025 NCAA Philippines. All Rights Reserved.

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • X
  • Youtube
NCAA New Logo
bottom of page